Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

By Hannah Nokes and Maggie Z. Miller 

From a business perspective, the turbulent year of 2021 will be remembered for “The Great Resignation,” when record numbers of employees left their jobs.

But when it comes to the worldwide problem of talent shortages across many industries, perhaps employers haven’t seen anything yet. New Year’s resolutions of retaining top employees or finding the right talents when recruiting may be even more difficult to achieve.

In a survey conducted in the fall of 2021 by LumApps in collaboration with CMSWire, 71% of U.S. participants said the pandemic made them

link hidden, please login to view
, and 63% have considered a new career in the past year.

All that data fuels concerns among many employers that the talent shortage will continue to be a major problem in 2022. Everest Group’s 2022 Key Issues Study shows companies’

link hidden, please login to view
now is “finding enough talent to run the business.”

The talent crunch, along with the trend for many companies to move from 100% remote work to a hybrid model or back to a fully in-person model, is causing business leaders to reconsider what keeps their teams happy and productive. Many are asking: How can we keep employees invested in and passionate about our brand in this new hybrid environment? 

One key to keeping the best employees on board may lie in how well companies give them the opportunity to put their own skills and interests into action toward making a difference in the world. In the LumApps/CMS poll regarding “The Great Reflection” among workers, among the reasons cited are heightened demands for flexibility and inclusivity in the workplace, more career growth and companies that walk the talk about corporate social responsibility.

Indeed, employees’ special gifts and passions for social issue involvement contribute toward helping their company’s overall impact efforts and also to employees’ fulfillment. In the LumApps/CMS poll, 76% of respondents said they’re looking for corporate social responsibility and 73% want to choose employers with a reputation for supporting diversity, equity and inclusion.

Just as businesses have unique abilities and resources to solve problems for their communities, their employees have their own set of talents that can add a rich dimension to the company’s social-impact profile.

Unleashing those talents can be as simple and informal as assigning appropriate roles to your employees for a volunteer project. If there’s a photographer on the team, for example, have them take photos at the event. Have a group that loves to haul things in their pickup trucks? Put them in charge of collecting the cans from your office locations for your food drive. 

Over time, of course, you can become more intentional and strategic about how you use your employees’ skills. We conduct an employee survey or focus group with our client teams to identify employee interests such as public speaking, strategic planning, committee leadership, budget planning and more. Effectively leveraging these skills and interests helps extend our client’s impact footprint in the community, even with limited formal staff resources. 

Employees, especially the younger workforce, are looking for a deeper meaning in their work and to feel as though they are contributing to something impactful. Millennials are especially vigilant about researching and weighing the values and cultures of companies they want to work for. Gen Z is following suit, looking for authentic commitments from their employer to take action to solve the world’s problems.

This is worth the effort: Recent

link hidden, please login to view
show that 95% of employees believe businesses should benefit all stakeholders, including the communities in which they operate, and 70% say they wouldn’t work for a company without a strong purpose.

Employers are understanding that social impact is a critical component to an effective business strategy. In today’s connected and interdependent world, employees increasingly demand that businesses and their suppliers take part in creating solutions to the world’s most pressing problems. It’s time to fire up those special talents and passions to build engagement and loyalty.

About the Authors

Maggie Z. Miller and Hannah Nokes are ForbesBooks co-authors of “Magnify Your Impact: Powering Profit with Purpose” (

link hidden, please login to view
). They also are co-founders of Magnify Impact, a company that helps business leaders create effective social-impact strategies. Miller has developed social-impact solutions with hundreds of company leaders globally. Previously, she founded an international nonprofit organization to provide microcredit loans for thousands of women in Peru. Nokes has led corporate social responsibility for global corporations and founded an impact collaborative of companies in Austin, Texas.

The post

link hidden, please login to view
appeared first on
link hidden, please login to view
.

link hidden, please login to view

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By Athrelle
      I recently ordered some OEM parts from link hidden, please login to view, and I was really happy with the whole experience. Their website is well-organized, making it easy to find the exact parts I needed for my Subaru. The prices were competitive compared to other sites I checked, and they had items in stock that I couldn’t find elsewhere.
      Shipping was faster than expected, and everything arrived well-packaged and in perfect condition. The parts were exactly as described, and I had no issues with fitment. Overall, it was a hassle-free experience, and I’ll definitely be ordering from them again in the future. If you’re looking for genuine Subaru parts, they’re worth checking out!
    • By Athrelle
      Just wanted to share my positive experience with
      link hidden, please login to view. I recently ordered some OEM parts for my Subaru, and the whole process was smooth. Their website was easy to navigate, prices were reasonable, and shipping was quicker than expected. Everything arrived well-packaged and exactly as described. Definitely bookmarking them for future orders! Let me know if you'd like any tweaks! 🚗

    • By Counterman
      It’s safe to say that most of the vehicles on the road today have a MacPherson Strut type of suspension in the front. Most of these are of the design with one lower control arm on each side (as opposed to a multi-link suspension). Taking it one final step, most of these have the ball joints riveted to the control arm.
      As luck would have it, the first suspension component that usually wears out on one of these vehicles is… you guessed it, the ball joint! So, when it comes time to replace them, you have a choice. These ball joints are available in two ways, as just the joint itself, or as the ball joint and control arm as a complete assembly.
      So then comes the million-dollar question. Do you replace just the joint or the entire control arm? Your customer will likely ask your opinion.
      Often, the decision comes down to who’s doing the work or who’s paying the bill, and sometimes a combination of both. There are pros and cons to each. Replacing just the joint by itself is the most economical from the standpoint of parts, but how hard is it to deal with the rivets that hold them in place? Is there extra labor? Replacing the entire control arm assembly is more expensive, but there are only traditional fasteners to deal with. Both jobs require an alignment afterward, so that’s a wash.
      A new control arm includes new bushings, an additional benefit, but that’s when the argument can begin. If the control arm bushings are ok, why take the extra time to replace the entire arm, look up additional torque specs and potentially replace extra fasteners? After all, replacement ball joints come with bolts for reinstallation, so it may seem like it’s easier to replace just the joint, and you can replace the ball joint without removing the control arm, right? Well, you can…but there’s more to that story.
      What better way to decide than with a good, old-fashioned case study. My 2014 Chevrolet Equinox had recently started clunking in the front, and upon inspection I found both front ball joints were bad. This was the perfect time to compare jobs, so I ordered a new control arm for one side and just a new ball joint for the other. Let me say that I’m no stranger to riveted ball joints, and I was certain I already knew what would be easier on this particular job, but I’m a glutton for punishment so why not find out for sure?
      For many years, I worked at a Volkswagen specialty shop, back when the original Rabbit and other Mk1 models were still a common sight on the roads. These cars had riveted ball joints, and the nature of the aftermarket at the time was still to replace only the bad components. This was well before things like complete CV axles or control arm assemblies were readily available; replacing individual CV boots or ball joints was commonplace.
      It didn’t take long to master the process of replacing a ball joint on one of these cars. You have two choices for this job, either drilling out the rivets or shearing them off. I had an air hammer bit designed specifically for shearing off the rivets (you can still buy these if you want one). I’d don my safety glasses and hearing protection, warn the shop it was about to get loud and then it took only a few seconds per rivet to shear the lower head of each of them off. Then, I’d switch to a punch bit and drive out the remainder of the rivets.
      Unbolt the joint from the knuckle, slide the old one out and the new one in, reinstall the bolts and you were done. Sounds easy, right? It was, but the rivets were comparatively small. So were the control arms and control arm bushings. Everything was small and lightweight and easier to move around.
      Nothing on new cars is small anymore. The control arms and bushings are larger, heavier and harder to work with, and the rivets that hold the ball joint in place are much larger in size. You can’t shear them off as easily. When you’re going to remove them, the best method is to use a cut-off wheel and cut into the head of the rivet in a cross pattern. This divides the head into four sections that you can then more easily shear off.
      However, you should always take the word “easily” with a grain of salt. This can still be a difficult process, and after shearing off the rivet heads, rust often makes it difficult to drive them out. In addition to the noise and the negative effect of the vibration on your hands and wrists, you’re also wearing down both a cut-off wheel and air hammer bits, none of which are inexpensive to replace, so there’s an additional tool expense with this method when you really nit-pick the details.
      So how did the Equinox compare? It was obvious what I was going to do on the control arm side, but on the other side, the ball joint had large, stout rivets, as expected. The manufacturer service information tells you to drill them out when removing the old ball joints, but it also tells you to remove the entire control arm and secure it in a vise before drilling out them out.
      Remove the control arm? What does the manufacturer know? I never used to remove the control arm. Why should I take that extra time? My gut still told me to cut and shear the rivets, but these had a small divot in the center of each, which was even better since it was the perfect centering point for a drill bit. So, my decision was to drill out the old rivets with the control arm on the car.
      Luckily, I had a brand-new set of stepped drill bits, which have been the best drill bits I ever owned. It was off to the races. I sized a bit up based on the new bolts, but I was careful not to go too large in case I ended up off center. I didn’t want to remove any material from the control arm. The drill bits cut well, but these rivets were no wimpy metal. I stopped a couple times to let the bit cool and let my arms recover, and overall, it took well over five minutes to get through just one rivet.
      After finally drilling them all out (a decision I was regretting), I still had to shear off remaining parts of the rivet heads on bottom, and drive the rivet through, both of which I was able to do by hand with a hammer and chisel. Comparatively, drilling the rivets was quieter, but ultimately not much easier on the hands or arms, as it took longer and there was still wear and tear on expensive tools.
      After getting the rivets out, I still had to remove the nut from the top of the ball joint, separate it from the knuckle with a pickle fork, then wrestle the ball joint out. Wrestling the new ball joint in place was more difficult than I expected due to the tension on the control arm bushings, and I pinched my fingers in the process, with nothing nice to say about my decision at this point. Once it was in, I installed the new castle nut and cotter pin, installed the three bolts to hold the ball joint to the control arm and was done with the job.
      All in all, between getting the tools together and fighting with the various aspects of this method, it took me about an hour and a half to install the ball joint, and I had a mess of shavings and sheared rivets to clean up. Published book time for the job is 1.4 hours, so I wasn’t too far off, but I can think of many things I would rather have been doing.
      So, now onto replacing the control arm on the other side. With just a few sockets, ratchet and wrenches, I removed the rear control arm bolts, front control arm bolt and ball joint nut. Then, I separated the ball joint from the knuckle with a pickle fork, pulled the control arm out, slid the new one in place, bolted it back up, installed the wheels and lowered the vehicle onto the suspension so I could tighten the bushings with the suspension at ride height.
      All in all, I had 20 minutes in replacing the control arm, and maybe not even that long. And there was no drama, no pinched fingers, and I didn’t add any wear to any tools, or to my hands and wrists.
      I saved money on the ball joint only because I wasn’t paying anyone labor to do the job, but, in retrospect, if I were to do it again, I would absolutely remove the entire arm before drilling out the rivets. I still wouldn’t want to drill them out. It was far from easy, and the one thing none of us ever has enough of is time, and you can’t get that back. Does replacing just the ball joint really make sense? I know my answer. I’ll let you decide.
      The post
      link hidden, please login to view appeared first on link hidden, please login to view.
      link hidden, please login to view
    • By Counterman
      The Auto Care Association announced it has been
      link hidden, please login to view. “This prestigious award is a testament to the association’s commitment to creating an inclusive, supportive and dynamic work environment for its employees,” Auto Care said in a news release.
      With a remarkable 95% of employees affirming that the Auto Care Association is a great place to work, the organization stands out significantly above the national average. This recognition is based on direct feedback from employees, provided as part of the Great Place to Work’s rigorous, data-driven methodology.
      The survey highlighted several areas where the Auto Care Association excels, including management’s approachability, effective coordination and assignment of tasks and the provision of necessary resources and equipment to employees.
      Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, the Auto Care Association employs more than 40 U.S.-based workers and is renowned for its advocacy, educational, networking, technology and market-intelligence resources. It plays a pivotal role in the automotive aftermarket, driving innovation and competitiveness through its evaluation of market trends and development of new tools to adapt to evolving patterns.
      “This certification is not just a milestone for our association but a reflection of the hard work, dedication, and passion of our team,” said Bill Hanvey, president and CEO of the Auto Care Association. “We are deeply committed to ensuring our workplace is not only rewarding and supportive but also fosters the growth and development of all our employees.”
      The Auto Care Association added that its “culture is built on a foundation of mutual respect, collaboration and a shared vision for the future of the automotive aftermarket.”
      Auto Care uses the acronym TCIF to summarize its corporate values. It stands for Teamwork, Curiosity, Integrity and Fun. These values “have cultivated a workplace where 97% of employees feel management is approachable and hires people who fit well within the organization,” according to Auto Care.
      “Great member service starts with a strong internal foundation,” said Lea Diamond, vice president, people operations, for the Auto Care Association. “Our strengths internally are reflected in the level of service and care we provide to our members and the industry.”
      The post
      link hidden, please login to view appeared first on link hidden, please login to view.
      link hidden, please login to view
    • Government UFO Files
    • By NAPA
      A resilient effort by Christian Eckes and the
      link hidden, please login to view team salvaged a top-10 finish in the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series (NCTS) opener at Daytona International Speedway on Friday night. The driver of the No. 19 NAPA Auto Care Chevrolet Silverado RST finished 10th despite being involved in three multi-truck accidents in the second half of the event. His 10th-place result earned him 39 points and places him third in the NCTS championship standings.
      Eckes was buried deep in the field after qualifying 25th, but he instantly darted toward the front once the green flag flew. Eckes’ aggression was immediately evident as he made three-wide moves on the opening lap. He narrowly avoided a multi-truck accident on lap six and joined the top-10 on lap 13. A one-lap dash to close Stage 1 saw Eckes grab three points in eighth position on lap 20.

      Crew chief Charles Denike kept Eckes on track during the caution to inherit track position and found themselves in the mix for the race lead when Stage 2 went green at lap 27. Eckes was in the thick of the battle for the race lead and pushed his new MHR teammate Tyler Ankrum to the Stage 2 win. Eckes pocketed another nine points by running second at the end of the segment on lap 40.

      Under the second-stage caution, Eckes pitted for four tires and fuel and restarted 12th on lap 45. A caution on lap 57 allowed him, and several other competitors, to make their final stop for fuel. Eckes restarted 16th on lap 62 and rocketed to the front with some aggressive drafting. He briefly took the lead on lap 72 but was involved in an accident on lap 79 while running second. Despite losing a lap, the NAPA Auto Care team made ample repairs and allowed Eckes to regain his lap on lap 86. With five laps to go, he suffered minor damage in an incident which set up an overtime restart. After restarting 24th with two laps remaining, Eckes drove halfway back through the field but was swept into a track-blocking accident on the final lap and suffered significant damage.

      Eckes was able to refire his Chevrolet Silverado RST and drove back around to the checkered flag to finish 10th and start the season just four points out of the championship lead.

      “Tonight was a wild night, for sure,” Eckes said. “We were able to drive our NAPA Auto Care Chevrolet up to the front a couple times and were going to be one of the trucks to beat. I was able to work well with our teammates for a while tonight until we got turned off Turn 4 there with 20-to-go or so. I’m proud of the guys on our NAPA team to get it fixed and got our lap back. We never gave up tonight and we saved a ton of points because of it.”
      Start / Finish: 25 / 10
      Points Standing / Total: 3rd / 39 pts. (-4)
      Next Race: Saturday, Feb. 24, Atlanta Motor Speedway
      How to Watch or Listen: 2:00 p.m. ET on FS1, MRN or SiriusXM
      NAPA: 
      link hidden, please login to viewChristian Eckes:  link hidden, please login to view
      Bill McAnally Racing / McAnally-Hilgemann Racing:  link hidden, please login to view The post
      link hidden, please login to view appeared first on link hidden, please login to view.
      link hidden, please login to view

×
  • Create New...